Comment on “Ferromagnetic film on a superconducting substrate”
E. B. Sonin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.136501 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A superconducting substrate is not able to shrink drastically domains in a ferromagnetic film, contrary to the prediction of Bulaevskii and Chudnovsky. This is shown on the basis of the exact solution for the stripe domain structure.
Similar papers
Comment on "Ferromagnetic film on a superconducting substrate"
similarity 0.92E. B. Sonin · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0102102
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to “Comment on ‘Ferromagnetic film on a superconducting substrate’ ”
similarity 0.91L. N. Bulaevskii et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Domain Structure in a Superconducting Ferromagnet”
similarity 0.87E. B. Sonin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Is There a Ferromagnet to Ferromagnetic s-Wave Superconductor Phase Transition?
similarity 0.86Yuan Zhou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic field induced global paramagnetic response in Fulde-Ferrell superconducting strip
similarity 0.86P. M. Marychev et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.11351
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ferromagnetic Film on a Superconducting Substrate
similarity 0.85L. N. Bulaevskii & E. M. Chudnovsky · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0007159
Source status unknown — claims are unverified