Spin-glass behavior, spin fluctuations, and superconductivity in Sr2Y(Ru1−uCuu)O6
Dale R. Harshman, W. J. Kossler, A. J. Greer, D. R. Noakes, C. E. Stronach, E. Koster, M. K. Wu, F. Z. Chien, J. P. Franck, I. Isaac, John D. Dow
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.054509 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Muon spin rotation measurements of Sr2Y(Ru1−uCuu)O6 (for u=0.1) reveal two distinct muon sites: one located in a SrO layer (which is superconducting at low temperatures) and the other in a Y(Ru1−uCuu)O4 layer (which is magnetically ordered at low temperatures). A precursor spin-glass state due to the Ru moments is detected in high fields (≈3.3 kOe) in Y(Ru1−uCuu)O4 layers, with a spin-glass temperature of TG=29.25K. The Y(Ru1−uCuu)O4 layers order ferromagnetically in the a-b planes at the Néel temperature, TN≈23K. This in-plane ferromagnetism alternates direction between adjacent Y(Ru1−uCuu)O4 planes, resulting in a net antiferromagnetic structure. Although the onset of superconductivity is observed both by electron spin resonance and by dc susceptibility to occur for temperatures up to about Tc,onset≈49K, this superconductivity is adversely affected by the Ru moments that fluctuate for T>TN producing magnetic fields that break pairs in the SrO layers. The muons, as well as other probes, sense the more-robust static superconductivity for T<TG. In fact, resistance measurements only show zero resistance below TN, at which temperatures the Ru moments that fluctuated for T>TN are frozen in-plane. Hence strictly speaking, the superconducting transition temperature is the same as TN, which is far below Tc,onset. Below TN there are no pair breaking fluctuating magnetic fields in the SrO layers where the hole condensate resides.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2Y(Ru1-uCuu)O6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 49 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Sr2Y(Ru0.9Cu0.1)O6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 49 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Sr2Y(Ru0.9Cu0.1)O6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
Similar papers
Spin fluctuations in superconducting La1.85Sr0.15CuO4
similarity 0.92M. Matsuda et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of Sn, Nb, and La substitution on superconductivity and magnetic order in RuSr2RCu2O8 (R=Eu,Gd)
similarity 0.92G. V. M. Williams et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrodynamic response of Y1Ba2Cu3Oy and La1.85Sr0.15CuO4−δ in the superconducting state
similarity 0.91S. Sridhar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting RuSr2GdCu2O8 studied by SQUID magnetometry
similarity 0.91Thomas P. Papageorgiou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microstructure and properties of the ∼90-K superconductor Bi2Sr3−xCaxCu2O8+δ
similarity 0.91Z. Iqbal et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-tunneling studies on the superconducting (La1−xSrx)2CuO4 and YBa2Cu3Oy systems
similarity 0.91Toshikazu Ekino & Jun Akimitsu
Source status unknown — claims are unverified