← Back to search

From phase- to amplitude-fluctuation-driven superconductivity in systems with precursor pairing

J. Ranninger, L. Tripodi

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.174521 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The change-over from phase- to amplitude-fluctuation-driven superconductivity is examined for a composite system of free electrons (fermions with concentration nF) and localized electron pairs (hard-core bosons with concentration nB) as a function of doping—changing the total concentration of charge carriers (ntot=nF+2nB). The coupling together of these two subsystems via a charge exchange term induces electron pairing and ultimately superconductivity in the fermionic subsystem. The difference in statistics of the two species of charge carriers has important consequences on the doping mechanism, showing an onset temperature T* of incoherent electron pairing in the fermionic subsystem (manifest in form of a pseudogap), which steadily decreases with decreasing ntot. Below T* this electron pairing leads, in the normal phase, to electron-pair resonant states (Cooperons) with quasiparticle features which strongly depend on ntot. For high concentrations, where nB≃0.5, correlation effects between the hard-core bosons lead to itinerant Cooperons having a heavy mass mp, but are long lived. Upon reducing the concentration of charge carriers and consequently nB, the mass as well as the lifetime of those Cooperons is considerably reduced. As a result, for high values of nB, a superconducting state below T* sets in at a Tc, being controlled by the phase stiffness Dφ=ħ2np/mp of those Cooperons, where np denotes their density. Upon reducing ntot, the phase stiffness steadily increases, and eventually exceeds the pairing energy kBT*. There, the Cooperons loose their well defined itinerant quasi-particle features and superconductivity gets controlled by amplitude fluctuations. The resulting phase diagram with doping is reminiscent of that of the phase fluctuation scenario for high-Tc superconductivity, except that in our scenario the determinant factors are the mass and the lifetime of the Cooperons rather than their density.

Similar papers