Interaction between two structural blocks and superconductivity in La2−xMxCuO4(M=Ba,Sr)
S. X. Wang, H. Zhang
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.012503 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The combinative energy between two structural blocks in La2−xMxCuO4(M=Ba,Sr), with different M concentration, has been calculated with holes in different positions in the CuO2 planes on the basis of a block model. The relationship between the combinative energy and superconductivity has been investigated. The results indicate that there is an interesting correlation among the combinative energy, the Tc value, and the positions of the doped holes, which are originated from the substitution of Ba2+ or Sr2+ for La3+. Although there are some similarities in correlation between La2−xBaxCuO4 (0.03<x<0.25) and La2−xSrxCuO4(0.075<~x<~0.3), there are also some notable differences which may be originated from different properties of the substituted elements: barium and strontium. The results not only suggest that the interaction between perovskite-type and rocksalt-type blocks plays an essential role in high-Tc superconductivity, but also give us some clues of the influence of the position of the holes within the CuO2 plane.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xBaxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xBaxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xBaxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xBaxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xBaxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 33.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 36 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 34 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 20 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity and charge-carrier localization in ultrathin La1.85Sr0.15CuO4/La2CuO4 bilayers
similarity 0.96K. Sen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structural instability in single crystals of the high-Tc superconductor La2−x Srx CuO4
similarity 0.96Urs Geiser et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in lanthanum cuprates: A layered-electron-gas model
similarity 0.96Dinesh Varshney & R. K. Singh
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure and properties of quasi-two-dimensional layered superconducting perovskites: La2−xMxCuO4 (M=Ba,Sr, …)
similarity 0.96A. J. Freeman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal conductivity across the phase diagram of cuprates: Low-energy quasiparticles and doping dependence of the superconducting gap
similarity 0.96Mike Sutherland et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Properties that change as superconductivity disappears at high-doping concentrations in La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.96J. B. Torrance et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified