← Back to search

Point-contact spectroscopy of the electron-doped cuprate superconductor Pr2−xCexCuO4: The dependence of conductance-voltage spectra on cerium doping, barrier strength, and magnetic field

M. M. Qazilbash, Amlan Biswas, Y. Dagan, R. A. Ott, R. L. Greene

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.024502 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We present conductance-voltage (G−V) data for point-contact junctions between a normal metal and the electron-doped cuprate superconductor Pr2−xCexCuO4 (PCCO). We observe a zero-bias conductance peak for the underdoped composition of this cuprate (x=0.13) which is consistent with d-wave pairing symmetry. For optimally doped (x=0.15) and overdoped (x=0.17) PCCO, we find that the G−V characteristics indicate the presence of an order parameter without nodes. We investigate this further by obtaining point-contact spectroscopy data for different barrier strengths and as a function of magnetic field. We observe a gaplike feature at the Fermi energy in the normal state of PCCO (H>~Hc2) for all dopings.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Pr2-xCexCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

12Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr2-xCexCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

21Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr2-xCexCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

14Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

89.5Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers