Competition of superconductivity and magnetism in MoSr2R1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10−δ (R=rare−earth)
I. Felner, E. Galstyan
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.064507 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have investigated the MoSr2R1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10−δ (Mo−1222R, R=rareearth) system by several complementary experimental techniques. In contrast to the isostructural RuSr2R1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10−δ (Ru-1222) system, in which superconductivity (SC) in the CuO2 planes and weak ferromagnetism in the Ru sublattice coexists, in Mo-1222, displays a competition between the two states, namely, SC vanishes when the magnetic order sets in. The contraction in the R elements leads to a change of the physical states. The light R ions (Pr and Nd) are paramagnetic down to 5 K, whereas the middle R ions (Sm and Eu) are SC at Tc 18–23 K, respectively. The SC charge carriers originate from the CuO2 planes, and annealing under oxygen pressures does not affect Tc. A simple model for the SC state is proposed. For the heavy R elements Ho-Lu and Y, the pentavalent Mo layers are antiferromagnetically (AFM) ordered at TN ranging from 13–26 K. For R=Gd, the sample is not SC and exhibit two magnetic transitions at 11 and 184 K. Both the SC or AFM states depend strongly on the R/Ce ratio and for R/Ce=1, both states are suppressed.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoSr2Sm1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| MoSr2Eu1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| RuSr2R2-xCexCu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RuSr2GdCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbSr2R1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TaSr2R1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Competition of Superconductivity and Magnetism in MoSr2R1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10-d (R=Rare-earth, Mo-1222)
similarity 1.00I. Felner & E. Galstyan · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0304552
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic behavior of superconducting and nonsuperconducting RuSr2Y2−xCexCu2O10 (x=0.5,1.0)
similarity 0.97I. Felner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement of critical current density in superconducting/magnetic multilayers with slow magnetic relaxation dynamics and large magnetic susceptibility
similarity 0.96Shi-Zeng Lin & Lev N. Bulaevskii
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of Ferromagnetism and Singlet Superconductivity via Kinetic Exchange
similarity 0.96Mario Cuoco et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between Ferromagnetism and Superconductivity in Tunneling Currents
similarity 0.96M. S. Grønsleth et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic-superconducting phase diagram of Eu2−xCexRuSr2Cu2O10−δ
similarity 0.95I. Felner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified