Ambivalence of the anisotropy of the vortex lattice in an anisotropic type-II superconductor
I. L. Landau, A. V. Sologubenko, H. R. Ott
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.132506 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a geometry-based discussion of possible vortex configurations in the mixed state of anisotropic type-II superconductors. It is shown that if energy considerations assign six nearest neighbors to each vortex, two distinct modifications of the vortex lattice are possible. It is expected that certain conditions lead to a first order phase transition from one modification of the vortex lattice to the other upon varying the external magnetic field.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Conditions for nonmonotonic vortex interaction in two-band superconductors
similarity 0.98A. Chaves et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field dependence of the zero-energy density of states around vortices in an anisotropic-gap superconductor
similarity 0.98N. Nakai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gap anisotropy in multiband superconductors based on multiple scattering theory
similarity 0.97Tom G. Saunderson et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic state around vortex in a two-band superconductor
similarity 0.97Masanori Ichioka et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux quantization for a vortex in two-gap superconductor
similarity 0.96E. Šimánek
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stabilizing fractional vortices in multiband superconductors with periodic pinning arrays
similarity 0.96Shi-Zeng Lin & Charles Reichhardt
Source status unknown — claims are unverified