Crystal structure of the sodium cobaltate deuterate superconductor NaxCoO2⋅4xD2O (x≈13)
J. D. Jorgensen, M. Avdeev, D. G. Hinks, J. C. Burley, S. Short
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.214517 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Neutron and x-ray powder diffraction have been used to investigate the crystal structures of a sample of the newly-discovered superconducting sodium cobaltate deuterate compound with composition Na0.31(3)CoO2⋅1.25(2)D2O and its anhydrous parent compound Na0.61(1)CoO2. The anhydrous parent compound Na0.61(1)CoO2 has two partially occupied Na sites sandwiched, in the same plane, between CoO2 layers. When Na is removed to make the superconducting composition, the Na site that experiences the strongest Na–Co repulsion is emptied while the occupancy of the other Na site is reduced to about one third. The deuterate superconducting compound is formed by coordinating four D2O molecules (two above and two below) to each remaining Na ion in a way that gives Na–O distances nearly equal to those in the parent compound. One deuteron of the D2O molecule is hydrogen bonded to an oxygen atom in the CoO2 plane and the oxygen atom and the second deuteron of each D2O molecule lie approximately in a plane between the Na layer and the CoO2 layers. This coordination of Na by four D2O molecules leads in a straightforward way to ordering of the Na ions and D2O molecules consistent with the observation of additional shorter-range scattering features in the diffraction data. The sample studied here, which has Tc=4.5K, has a refined composition of Na0.31(3)CoO2⋅1.25(2)D2O, in agreement with the expected 1:4 ratio of Na to D2O. These results show that the optimal superconducting composition should be viewed as a specific hydrated compound, not a solid solution of Na and D2O (H2O) in NaxCoO2⋅D2O. The hydrated superconducting compound may be stable over a limited range of Na and D2O concentration, but studies of Tc and other physical properties vs Na or D2O composition should be viewed with caution until it is verified that the compound remains in the same phase over the composition range of the study.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Na0.31CoO2*1.25D2O Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Na0.3CoO2*1.4H2O Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| NaxCoO2*1.3H2O Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Crystal Structure of the Sodium Cobaltate Deuterate Superconductor NaxCoO2o4xD2O (x=1/3)
similarity 0.99J. D. Jorgensen et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0307627
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revised Superconducting Phase Diagram of Hole-Doped Nax(H3O)zCoO2·yH2O
similarity 0.95C. J. Milne et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamic and Transport Measurements of Superconducting Na0.3CoO2·1.3H2O Single Crystals Prepared by Electrochemical Deintercalation
similarity 0.94F. C. Chou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate in the D1+iD2 superconducting state: Implications for CoO superconductor
similarity 0.94Yunkyu Bang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structure and dynamics of superconducting NaxCoO2 hydrate and its unhydrated analog
similarity 0.93J. W. Lynn et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal expansion and compressibility in superconducting NaxCoO2∙4xD2O(x≈1∕3): Evidence for pressure-induced charge redistribution
similarity 0.92J. D. Jorgensen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified