Sum rules and energy scales in the high-temperature superconductor YBa2Cu3O6+x
C. C. Homes, S. V. Dordevic, D. A. Bonn, Ruixing Liang, W. N. Hardy
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.024514 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Ferrell-Glover-Tinkham (FGT) sum rule has been applied to the temperature dependence of the in-plane optical conductivity of optimally doped YBa2Cu3O6.95 and underdoped YBa2Cu3O6.60. Within the accuracy of the experiment, the sum rule is obeyed in both materials. However, the energy scale ωc required to recover the full strength of the superfluid ρs in the two materials is dramatically different; ωc≃800cm−1 in the optimally doped system (close to twice the maximum of the superconducting gap 2Δ0), but ωc≳5000cm−1 in the underdoped system. In both materials, the normal-state scattering rate close to the critical temperature is small, Γ<2Δ0, so that the materials are not in the dirty limit and the relevant energy scale for ρs in a BCS material should be twice the energy gap. The FGT sum rule in the optimally doped material suggests that the majority of the spectral weight of the condensate comes from energies below 2Δ0, which is consistent with a BCS material in which the condensate originates from a Fermi-liquid normal state. In the underdoped material the larger energy scale may be a result of the non-Fermi-liquid nature of the normal state. The dramatically different energy scales suggest that the nature of the normal state creates specific conditions for observing the different aspects of what is presumably a central mechanism for superconductivity in these materials.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O6.95 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 91 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6.60 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 57 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Sum rules and energy scales in the high-temperature superconductor YBa2Cu3O6+x
similarity 1.00C. C. Homes et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0303506
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scaling of the superfluid density in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.95C. C. Homes et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nernst and Seebeck Coefficients of the Cuprate Superconductor YBa2Cu3O6.67: A Study of Fermi Surface Reconstruction
similarity 0.95J. Chang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Frequency-dependent relaxation rate in superconducting YBa2Cu3O6+δ
similarity 0.94A. Pimenov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scaling of vortex-liquid resistivity in high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.94B. Espinosa-Arronte & M. Andersson
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting fluctuation effects on the electron spin susceptibility in YBa2Cu3O6.95
similarity 0.94H. N. Bachman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified