← Back to search

Reply to “Comment on ‘First-principles calculation of the superconducting transition in MgB2 within the anisotropic Eliashberg formalism’ ”

Hyoung Joon Choi, David Roundy, Hong Sun, Marvin L. Cohen, Steven G. Louie

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.056502 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The preceding comment by Mazin et al. on our work makes two claims: (1) the calculated variations of the superconducting energy gap within the σ or the π bands are not observable in real samples due to scatterings, and (2) the Coulomb repulsion μ(k,k′) is negligibly small between σ and π states and thus should be approximated by a diagonal 2×2 matrix in the σ and π channels. Here, we point out that the former does not affect the validity of our theoretical work, which is for the clean limit, and that the latter is based on an oversimplified estimation of μ.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

38Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers