Low-energy phase-only action in a superconductor: A comparison with the XY model
L. Benfatto, A. Toschi, S. Caprara
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.184510 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The derivation of the effective theory for the phase degrees of freedom in a superconductor is still, to some extent, an open issue. It is commonly assumed that the classical XY model and its quantum generalizations can be exploited as effective phase-only models. In the quantum regime, however, this assumption leads to spurious results, such as the violation of Galilean invariance in the continuum model. Starting from a general microscopic model, in this paper we explicitly derive the effective low-energy theory for the phase, up to fourth-order terms. This expansion allows us to properly take into account dynamic effects beyond the Gaussian level, both in the continuum and in the lattice model. After evaluating the one-loop corrections to the superfluid stiffness we critically discuss the qualitative and quantitative differences between the results obtained within the quantum XY model and within the correct low-energy theory, both in the case of s- and d-wave symmetry of the superconducting order parameter. Specifically, we find dynamic anharmonic vertices, which are absent in the quantum XY model, and are crucial to restore Galilean invariance in the continuum model. As far as the more realistic lattice model is concerned, in the weak-to-intermediate-coupling regime we find that the phase-fluctuation effects are quantitatively reduced with respect to the XY model. On the other hand, in the strong-coupling regime we show that the correspondence between the microscopically derived action and the quantum XY model is recovered, except for the low-density regime.
Similar papers
Nonperturbative XY-model approach to strong coupling superconductivity in two and three dimensions
similarity 0.89E. Babaev & H. Kleinert
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible destruction of the ordered phase in Josephson-junction arrays with positional disorder
similarity 0.88S. E. Korshunov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effective action for superconductors and BCS-Bose crossover
similarity 0.87S. De Palo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effective model for superconductivity in magic-angle graphene
similarity 0.86Disha Hou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticles and vortices in unconventional superconductors
similarity 0.86O. Vafek et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological superconductivity in the extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model
similarity 0.86Johann Schmidt et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified