Macroscopically inhomogeneous state at the boundary between the superconducting, antiferromagnetic, and metallic phases in quasi-one-dimensional (TMTSF)2PF6
A. V. Kornilov, V. M. Pudalov, Y. Kitaoka, K. Ishida, G.-q. Zheng, T. Mito, J. S. Qualls
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.224404 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report on experimental studies of the phase state and the character of phase transitions in the quasi-one-dimensional organic compound (TMTSF)2PF6 in the close vicinity of the borders between the metal (M), antiferromagnetic (AF) insulator, and superconducting (SC) states. In order to drive the system precisely through the phase border P0(T0), the sample was maintained at fixed temperature T and pressure P, whereas the critical pressure P0 was tuned by applying the magnetic field B. In this approach, the magnetic field was used (i) for smooth and precise tuning δP=P−P0 [thanks to a monotonic P0(B) dependence] and (ii) for identifying the phase composition (due to qualitatively different magnetoresistance behavior in different phases). Experimentally, we measured magnetoresistance R(B) and its temperature dependence R(B,T) in the pressure range 0–1 GPa. Our studies focus on the features of the magnetoresistance at the phase transitions between the M and AF phases and in the close vicinity to the superconducting transition at T≈1K. We found pronounced history effects arising when the AF/M phase border is crossed by sweeping the magnetic field: the resistance depends on a trajectory which the system arrives at a given point of the P−B−T phase space. In the transition from the M to AF phase, driven by increasing magnetic field, the features of the M phase extend well into the AF phase. At the opposite transition from the AF to M phase, the features of the AF phase are observed in the M phase. These results evidence for a macroscopically inhomogeneous state, which contains macroscopic inclusions of the minority phase, spatially separated from the majority phase. When the system is driven away from the transition, the homogeneous state is restored; upon a return motion to the phase boundary, no signatures of the minority phase are observed up to the phase boundary.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| (TMTSF)2PF6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Coexistence of Superconductivity and Antiferromagnetism Probed by Simultaneous Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Electrical Transport in (TMTSF)2PF6 System
similarity 0.96I. J. Lee et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic zero-resistance onset in organic superconductors
similarity 0.94Vladislav D. Kochev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Triplet organic quasi-one-dimensional superconductors: Angular dependence of the upper critical field
similarity 0.94C. D. Vaccarella & C. A. R. Sá de Melo
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revival of superconductivity in high magnetic fields and a possible p-wave pairing in (TMTSF)2PF6
similarity 0.93A. G. Lebed
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Periodic-orbit resonance in the quasi-one-dimensional organic superconductor (TMTSF)2ClO4
similarity 0.93S. Takahashi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
F-wave versus P-wave superconductivity in organic conductors
similarity 0.92R. W. Cherng & C. A. R. Sá de Melo
Source status unknown — claims are unverified