← Back to search

Depairing currents in superconducting films of Nb and amorphous MoGe

A. Yu. Rusanov, M. B. S. Hesselberth, J. Aarts

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.024510 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report on measuring the depairing current Jdp in thin superconducting films as a function of temperature. The main difficulties in such measurements are that heating has to be avoided, either due to contacts, or to vortex flow. The latter is almost unavoidable since the sample cross section is usually larger than the superconducting coherence length ξs and the magnetic field penetration depth λs. On the other hand, vortex flow is helpful since it homogenizes the distribution of the current across the sample. We used a pulsed current method, which allows us to overcome the difficulties caused by dissipation and measured the depairing current in films of thin polycrystalline Nb (low λs, low specific resistance ρ) and amorphous Mo0.7Ge0.3 (high λs, high ρ), structured in the shape of bridges of various width. The experimental values of Jdp for different bridge dimensions are compared with theoretical predictions by Kupriyanov and Lukichev for dirty limit superconductors. For the smallest samples we find a very good agreement with theory, over essentially the whole temperature interval below the superconducting critical temperature.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

8.3Pressure not reportedunknown
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9Pressure not reportedunknown
Mo0.7Ge0.3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6.25Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers