Andreev interference in adiabatic pumping
Fabio Taddei, Michele Governale, Rosario Fazio
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.052510 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Within the scattering approach, we develop a model for adiabatic quantum pumping in hybrid normal-superconductor systems where several superconducting leads are present. This is exploited to study Andreev-interference effects on adiabatically pumped charge in a three-arm beam splitter attached to one normal and two superconducting leads with different phases of the order parameters. We derive expressions for the pumped charge through the normal lead for different parameters for the scattering region, and elucidate the effects due to Andreev interference. In contrast to what happens for voltage-driven transport, Andreev interference does not yield, in general, a pumped current which is a symmetric function of the superconducting-phase difference.
Similar papers
Adiabatic Pumping in a Superconductor-Normal-Superconductor Weak Link
similarity 0.92M. Governale et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev interference in adiabatic pumping
similarity 0.91Fabio Taddei et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404173
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge pumping in mesoscopic systems coupled to a superconducting lead
similarity 0.90M. Blaauboer
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Adiabatic Quantum Pumping at the Josephson Frequency
similarity 0.90S. Russo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantized charge pumping in a superconducting double-barrier structure: Nontrivial correlations due to proximity effect
similarity 0.89Arijit Saha & Sourin Das
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charging effects and Andreev reflection in a double-junction circuit: A model approach combining rate equations and Green’s functions
similarity 0.89Ursula Schröter & Elke Scheer
Source status unknown — claims are unverified