← Back to search

Influence of randomly distributed magnetic nanoparticles on surface superconductivity in Nb films

D. Stamopoulos, M. Pissas, V. Karanasos, D. Niarchos, I. Panagiotopoulos

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.054512 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report on combined resistance and magnetic measurements in a hybrid structure (HS) of randomly distributed anisotropic CoPt magnetic nanoparticles (MN) embedded in a 160nm Nb thick film. Our resistance measurements exhibited a sharp increase at the magnetically determined bulk upper-critical fields Hc2(T). Above these points the resistance curves are rounded, attaining the normal state value at much higher fields identified as the surface superconductivity fields Hc3(T). When plotted in reduced temperature units, the characteristic field lines Hc3(T) of the HS and of a pure Nb film, prepared at exactly the same conditions, coincide for H<10kOe, while for fields H>10kOe they strongly segregate. Interestingly, the characteristic value H=10kOe is equal to the saturation field HsatMN of the MN. The behavior mentioned above is observed only for the case where the field is normal to the film’s surface, while it is absent when the field is parallel to the film. Our experimental results suggest that the observed enhancement of surface superconductivity field Hc3(T) is possibly due to the not uniform local reduction of the external magnetic field by the dipolar fields of the MN.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

8.3Pressure not reportedunknown
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

7.7Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers