Competition between triplet superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in quasi-one-dimensional electron systems
Daniel Podolsky, Ehud Altman, Timofey Rostunov, Eugene Demler
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.224503 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the competition between antiferromagnetism and triplet superconductivity in quasi-one-dimensional electron systems. We show that the two order parameters can be unified using a SO(4) symmetry and demonstrate the existence of such symmetry in one-dimensional Luttinger liquids of interacting electrons. We argue that approximate SO(4) symmetry remains valid even when interchain hopping is strong enough to turn the system into a strongly anisotropic Fermi liquid. For unitary triplet superconductors SO(4) symmetry requires a first order transition between antiferromagnetic and superconducting phases. Analysis of thermal fluctuations shows that the transition between the normal and the superconducting phases is weakly first order, and the normal to antiferromagnet phase boundary has a tricritical point, with the transition being first order in the vicinity of the superconducting phase. We propose that this phase diagram explains coexistence regions between the superconducting and the antiferromagnetic phases, and between the antiferromagnetic and the normal phases observed in (TMTSF)2PF6. For nonunitary triplet superconductors the SO(4) symmetry predicts the existence of a mixed phase of antiferromagnetism and superconductivity. We discuss experimental tests of the SO(4) symmetry in neutron scattering and tunneling experiments.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| (TMTSF)2PF6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| (TMTSF)2ClO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| (TMTSF)2AsF6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (TMTTF)2PF6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Odd Triplet Superconductivity in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Multilayered Structures
similarity 0.98A. F. Volkov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Manifestation of triplet superconductivity in superconductor-ferromagnet structures
similarity 0.98F. S. Bergeret et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Triplet superconductivity in quasi-one-dimensional systems
similarity 0.98A. A. Aligia & Liliana Arrachea
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Control of magnetism in singlet-triplet superconducting heterostructures
similarity 0.97Alfonso Romano et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Odd triplet superconductivity in a superconductor/ferromagnet structure with a narrow domain wall
similarity 0.97A. F. Volkov & K. B. Efetov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Density-induced quantum phase transitions in the ground state of triplet superconductors
similarity 0.97R. W. Cherng & C. A. R. Sá de Melo
Source status unknown — claims are unverified