Intergranular pinning potential and critical current in the magnetic superconductor RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10
M. G. das Virgens, S. García, M. A. Continentino, L. Ghivelder
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.064520 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The intergranular pinning potential U and the critical current density JC for polycrystalline RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10 ruthenate-cuprate were determined at zero magnetic field and temperature through the frequency shift in the peak of the imaginary part of the ac magnetic susceptibility, χ″. A critical state model, including a flux creep term, was found to accurately describe the χ″ behavior. The obtained values, U(H=0,T=0)≅30meV and JC(H=0,T=0)≅110A∕cm2 are about two orders of magnitude and four times lower, respectively, in comparison with the high-TC cuprate YBa2Cu3O7. These results were ascribed to the effects of the Ru magnetization on the connectivity of the weak-linked network, giving an intrinsic local field at the junctions of ∼15Oe. The impact on JC is less intense because of the small average grain radius (∼1μm). The intragranular London penetration length at T=0[λL(0)≅2μm] was derived using a Kim-type expression for the field dependence of JC. A possible source for the large value of λL in comparison to the high-Tc cuprates is suggested to come from a strong intragrain granularity, due to structural domains of coherent-rotated RuO6 octahedra separated by antiphase boundaries.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 22 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
ac magnetic hysteresis loops of Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O 110-K-phase superconductors and the effect of microstructural alteration
similarity 0.96N. Harish Kumar & V. Seshu Bai
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intra- versus interlayer pairing in copper oxide superconductors: Response to a magnetic field
similarity 0.96S. H. Liu & R. A. Klemm
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of matrix composition on the flux pinning in a (Nd,Eu,Gd)Ba2Cu3Oy superconductor
similarity 0.96M. Muralidhar & M. Murakami
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge fluctuations between CuO2 layers in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.96R. Friedberg & T. D. Lee
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spatiotemporal dynamics and plastic flow of vortices in superconductors with periodic arrays of pinning sites
similarity 0.96C. Reichhardt et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoupling and depinning of flux lattices in disordered layered superconductors
similarity 0.96Baruch Horovitz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified