← Back to search

Structure-properties relationship in ferromagnetic superconducting RuSr2GdCu2O8

O. I. Lebedev, G. Van Tendeloo, G. Cristiani, H.-U. Habermeier, A. T. Matveev

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.134523 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

RuSr2GdCu2O8 films with a different thickness are grown by pulsed laser deposition on a (100) STO substrate at 750 °C and an oxygen background pressure of 5×10−3Pa. The film structure is characterized by x-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and correlated with the physical properties. All films exhibit ferromagnetic ordering at temperatures around 130 K, however not all films show superconductivity. TEM reveals that superconductivity in the films is related to the presence of an orthorhombic Ru-1212 phase with unit cell parameters √2at×√2at×2ct. A model considering Cu substitution at Ru positions within the RuO2 layer is proposed. The structure of the orthorhombic Ru-1212 with a doubled c axis can be described as a periodic alteration of superconducting Ru1−xCuxSr2GdCu2O8−δ layers and ferromagnetic RuSr2GdCu2O8 layers. The structure in the thin film is strain induced, but there is a high probability that it will exist in bulk as well.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
RuSr2GdCu2O8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

48Pressure not reportedunknown
RuSr2GdCu2O8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedonset
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.5Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers