Circuit theory for decoherence in superconducting charge qubits
Guido Burkard
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.144511 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Based on a network graph analysis of the underlying circuit, a quantum theory of arbitrary superconducting charge qubits is derived. Describing the dissipative elements of the circuit with a Caldeira-Leggett model, we calculate the decoherence and leakage rates of a charge qubit. The analysis includes decoherence due to a dissipative circuit element such as a voltage source or the quasiparticle resistances of the Josephson junctions in the circuit. The theory presented here is dual to the quantum circuit theory for superconducting flux qubits. In contrast to spin-boson models, the full Hilbert space structure of the qubit and its coupling to the dissipative environment are taken into account. Moreover, both self- and mutual inductances of the circuit are fully included.
Similar papers
Multilevel quantum description of decoherence in superconducting qubits
similarity 0.95Guido Burkard et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle Relaxation of Superconducting Qubits in the Presence of Flux
similarity 0.90G. Catelani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear-response theory for lossy superconducting quantum circuits
similarity 0.89V. Vadimov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantifying dynamics and interactions of individual spurious low-energy fluctuators in superconducting circuits
similarity 0.89S. E. de Graaf et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum theory of the low-frequency linear susceptibility of interferometer-type superconducting qubits
similarity 0.88Ya. S. Greenberg & E. Il’ichev
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting qubits II: Decoherence
similarity 0.88Wilhelm, F. K. et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0603637
Source status unknown — claims are unverified