Crossover from Kramers to phase-diffusion switching in moderately damped Josephson junctions
J. Männik, S. Li, W. Qiu, W. Chen, V. Patel, S. Han, J. E. Lukens
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.220509 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have measured and propose a model for switching rates in a hysteretic dc superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) in the regime where phase-diffusion processes start to occur. We show that the switching rates in this regime are smaller than the rates given by Kramers’ formula due to retrapping of the Josephson phase. The retrapping process, which is affected by the frequency dependent impedance of the environment of the dc SQUID, leads to a peaked second moment of the switching distribution as a function of temperature. The temperatures where the peaks occur are proportional to the critical current of the dc SQUID.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Phase Dynamics of Ferromagnetic Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.96I. Petković & M. Aprili
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of noise and near-resonant perturbations on bifurcations in Josephson junctions
similarity 0.96H. Svensmark et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spatially resolved study of the dynamics of Josephson tunnel junctions
similarity 0.95S. G. Lachenmann et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave-Induced Thermal Escape in Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.95N. Grønbech-Jensen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of energy-level quantization on the supercurrent decay of Josephson junctions
similarity 0.95B. Ruggiero et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherence effects in double-barrier Josephson junctions
similarity 0.94A. Brinkman & A. A. Golubov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified