← Back to search

Superconductivity versus phase separation, stripes, and checkerboard ordering: A two-dimensional Monte Carlo study

Daniel Valdez-Balderas, David Stroud

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.214501 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Using Monte Carlo techniques, we study a simple model which exhibits a competition between superconductivity and other types of order in two dimensions. The model is a site-diluted XY model, in which the XY spins are mobile, and also experience a repulsive interaction extending to one, two, or many shells of neighbors. Depending on the strength and range of the repulsion and spin concentration, the spins arrange themselves into a remarkable variety of patterns at low temperatures T, including phase separation, checkerboard order, and straight or labyrinthine patterns of stripes, which sometimes show hints of nematic or smectic order. This pattern formation profoundly affects the superfluid density γ. Phase separation tends to enhance γ, checkerboard order suppresses it, and stripe formation increases the component of γ parallel to the stripes and reduces the perpendicular one. We verify that γ(T=0) is proportional to the effective conductance of a random conductance network whose conductances equal the couplings of the XY system. Possible connections between the model and real materials, such as single high-Tc cuprate layers, are briefly discussed.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Ca2-xNaxCuO2Cl2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers