Evolution of superconductivity in electron-doped cuprates: Magneto-Raman spectroscopy
M. M. Qazilbash, A. Koitzsch, B. S. Dennis, A. Gozar, Hamza Balci, C. A. Kendziora, R. L. Greene, G. Blumberg
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.214510 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The electron-doped cuprates Pr2−xCexCuO4−δ and Nd2−xCexCuO4−δ have been studied by electronic Raman spectroscopy across the entire region of the superconducting (SC) phase diagram. The SC pairing strength is found to be consistent with a weak-coupling regime except in the underdoped region where we observe an in-gap collective mode at 4.5kBTc while the maximum amplitude of the SC gap is ≈8kBTc. In the normal state, doped carriers divide into coherent quasiparticles (QPs) and carriers that remain incoherent. The coherent QPs mainly reside in the vicinity of (±π∕2a, ±π∕2a) regions of the Brillouin zone (BZ). We find that only coherent QPs contribute to the superfluid density in the B2g channel. The persistence of SC coherence peaks in the B2g channel for all dopings implies that superconductivity is mainly governed by interactions between the holelike coherent QPs in the vicinity of (±π∕2a, ±π∕2a) regions of the BZ. We establish that superconductivity in the electron-doped cuprates occurs primarily due to pairing and condensation of holelike carriers. We have also studied the excitations across the SC gap by Raman spectroscopy as a function of temperature (T) and magnetic field (H) for several different cerium dopings (x). Effective upper critical field lines Hc2*(T,x) at which the superfluid stiffness vanishes and Hc22Δ(T,x) at which the SC gap amplitude is suppressed by fields have been determined; Hc22Δ(T,x) is larger than Hc2*(T,x) for all doping concentrations. The difference between the two quantities suggests the presence of phase fluctuations that increase for x≲0.15. It is found that the magnetic field suppresses the magnitude of the SC gap linearly at surprisingly small fields.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pr2-xCexCuO4-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pr2-xCexCuO4-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd2-xCexCuO4-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Transport evidence of a magnetic quantum phase transition in electron-doped high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.96W. Yu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Symmetries of the superconducting order parameter arising from an interlayer tunneling mechanism
similarity 0.96A. Sudbo/ & S. P. Strong
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of Superconductivity in Electron-Doped Cuprates: Magneto-Raman Spectroscopy
similarity 0.96M. M. Qazilbash et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0510098
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Role of oxygen in the electron-doped superconducting cuprates
similarity 0.95J. S. Higgins et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of antiferromagnetism in the electron-doped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.94Xin-Zhong Yan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for Universal Signatures of Zeeman-Splitting-Limited Pseudogaps in Superconducting Electron- and Hole-Doped Cuprates
similarity 0.94Tsuyoshi Kawakami et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified