← Back to search

Reaching the Pauli limit in the cuprate Bi2Sr2CuO6+δ in high parallel magnetic fields

S. I. Vedeneev, Cyril Proust, V. P. Mineev, M. Nardone, G. L. J. A. Rikken

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.014528 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We present a careful study of the resistive superconducting transition in Bi2+xSr2−xCuO6+δ down to T∕Tc=0.04 for magnetic field applied parallel to the conducting planes. We find that 52T is enough to destroy superconductivity at low temperature. Based on a Ginzburg-Landau calculation, the paramagnetic limitation of superconductivity for the field parallel to the layers is considered as an explanation of the observed behavior.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2+xSr2-xCuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

10.2Pressure not reportedonset
Bi2+xSr2-xCuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9Pressure not reportedonset
Pr2-xCexCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CuO6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers