← Back to search

Electrical resistivity and Andreev reflection spectroscopy of the superconducting oxide spinel LiTi2O4

L. Tang, P. Y. Zou, L. Shan, A. F. Dong, G. C. Che, H. H. Wen

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.184521 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We measured resistivity and Andreev reflection spectroscopy on LiTi2O4 polycrystalline samples (Tc≈12.3K) synthesized by a new method. Resistivity shows the metallic temperature dependence and is well fitted by the Bloch-Grüneisen theory above 90K. This is consistent with the picture of electron-phonon scattering. Below 90K and above Tc it shows T2 temperature dependence suggesting Fermi liquid behavior above Tc. From the Hc2−T phase diagram the upper critical field Hc2(0) is estimated to be about 11.6T based on the Ginzburg-Landau theory. Point-contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy gives 2Δ0∕kBTC≈4 and reveals that LiTi2O4 is a typical intermediate-coupling s-wave BCS superconductor. We also observed the resistive hump in a normal state and the field-induced upturn near the transition region of the ρ(T) curve on the aged samples. In comparison with the fresh one, it suggests that the above exotic ρ(T) behavior is not an intrinsic character of the pure stoichiometric LiTi2O4 compound.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
LiTi2O4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

12.3Pressure not reportedmidpoint
LiTi2O4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

12.5Pressure not reportedonset
LiTi2O4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

11Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers