Energy entanglement in normal metal–superconducting forks
K. V. Bayandin, G. B. Lesovik, T. Martin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.085326 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The possibility for detecting energy entanglement in normal metal–superconductor junctions is examined. We prove that two electrons in a NS structure originating from the same Cooper pair are entangled in the energy subspace. This work follows previous works where spin entanglement was studied in similar circuits. The device consists of a superconducting beam splitter connected to two electronic Mach-Zehnder interferometers. In each arm of the interferometers, energies are filtered with coherent quantum dots. In contrast to previous studies of zero-frequency cross-correlations of electrical currents for this system, attention is drawn to finite-time measurements. This allows one to observe two-particle interference for particles with different energies above and below Fermi level. Entanglement is first characterized via the concurrence for the two-particle spatial density matrix. Next, we formulate the Bell inequality, which is written in terms of finite-time noise correlators, and thereby we find a specific set of parameters for which entanglement can be detected.
Similar papers
Spin correlation and entanglement detection in Cooper pair splitters by current measurements using magnetic detectors
similarity 0.92Piotr Busz et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Energy entanglement in normal metal-superconducting forks
similarity 0.91K. V. Bayandin et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0605428
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Entanglement of electron spins in superconductors
similarity 0.89Sangchul Oh & Jaewan Kim
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Finite-Bias Cooper Pair Splitting
similarity 0.88L. Hofstetter et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified