← Back to search

Superconducting spin switch with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy

A. Singh, C. Sürgers, H. v. Löhneysen

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.024513 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In a superconducting spin switch consisting of ferromagnet-superconductor-ferromagnet (FSF) triple layers, the superconducting transition temperature Tc can be controlled by switching the individual magnetization directions of the F layers from parallel (P) to antiparallel (AP) orientation. Here we study this effect on a Nb layer sandwiched between two ferromagnetic Co∕Pt multilayers (ML) with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. The coercive fields of the top and bottom ML are different so that a P or AP orientation of the F magnetizations can be easily achieved. Tc is considerably higher in the P configuration when compared to the AP configuration. By comparison with a sample, where an insulating oxide layer is introduced between F and S on both sides of the S layer we confirm that the Tc difference is due to the proximity effect. FSF triple layers with out-of-plane anisotropy may have potential applications in ultrahigh-density magnetic recording.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.299Pressure not reportedmidpoint
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.835Pressure not reportedmidpoint
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

7.412Pressure not reportedmidpoint
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

8.472Pressure not reportedmidpoint

Similar papers