← Back to search

Distinct doping dependences of the pseudogap and superconducting gap of La2−xSrxCuO4 cuprate superconductors

M. Hashimoto, T. Yoshida, K. Tanaka, A. Fujimori, M. Okusawa, S. Wakimoto, K. Yamada, T. Kakeshita, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.140503 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We have performed a temperature-dependent angle-integrated photoemission study of La2−xSrxCuO4 covering from lightly doped to heavily overdoped regions and oxygen-doped La2CuO4.10. The superconducting gap energy Δsc was found to remain small for decreasing hole concentration while the pseudogap energy Δ* and temperature T* increase. The different behaviors of the superconducting gap and the pseudogap can be explained if the superconducting gap opens only on the Fermi arc around the nodal (0,0)−(π,π) direction while the pseudogap opens around ∼(π,0). The results suggest that the pseudogap and the superconducting gap have different microscopic origins.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La2-xSrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

25Pressure not reportedunknown
La2-xSrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

38Pressure not reportedunknown
La2-xSrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

28Pressure not reportedunknown
La2CuO4.10

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

35Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers