Search for magnetic order in superconducting RuSr2Eu1.2Ce0.8Cu2O10
J. W. Lynn, Y. Chen, Q. Huang, S. K. Goh, G. V. M. Williams
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.014519 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Neutron diffraction, polarized neutron transmission, and small angle neutron scattering have been used to investigate the crystal structure and nature of the magnetic order in a polycrystalline sample of RuSr2Eu1.2Ce0.8Cu2O10. The sample was made with the Eu-153 (98.8%) isotope to reduce the high neutron absorption for the naturally occurring element. Full refinements of the crystal structure, space group I4∕mmm, are reported. At low temperatures only a single magnetic peak is clearly observed in a relatively wide angular range. A sharp spin reorientation transition (SRT) is observed around 35K, close to the superconducting transition temperature (Tc∼40K). Between the spin reorientation temperature and the Neel temperature of 59K, additional magnetic reflections are observed. However, none of these can be simply indexed on the chemical unit cell, either as commensurate peaks or simple incommensurate magnetism, and the paucity of reflections at low T compels the conclusion that these magnetic Bragg peaks arise from an impurity phase. X-ray and neutron diffraction on the pressed pellet both show that the sample does not appear to contain substantial impurity phases, but it turns out that the magnetic impurity peaks exhibit strong preferred orientation with respect to the pellet orientation, while the primary phase does not. We have been unable to observe any magnetic order that can be identified with the ruthenate-cuprate system.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| RuSr2Eu1.2Ce0.8Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| RuSr2GdCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Magnetic and electronic structures of superconducting RuSr2GdCu2O8
similarity 0.97K. Nakamura et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic and superconducting properties of RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10−δ samples: Dependence on the oxygen content and aging effects
similarity 0.97C. A. Cardoso et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic ordering in the superconducting weak ferromagnets RuSr2GdCu2O8 and RuSr2EuCu2O8
similarity 0.97J. D. Jorgensen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in ferromagnetic RuSr2GdCu2O8
similarity 0.96Jian-Xin Zhu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoupled CuO2 and RuO2 layers in superconducting and magnetically ordered RuSr2GdCu2O8
similarity 0.96M. Požek et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible competition between superconductivity and magnetism in RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10−δ ruthenocuprate compounds
similarity 0.96V. P. S. Awana et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified