Josephson effect in thin-film superconductor/insulator/superconductor junctions with misaligned in-plane magnetic fields
J. Linder, A. Sudbø
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.064524 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study a tunnel junction consisting of two thin-film s-wave superconductors separated by a thin, insulating barrier in the presence of misaligned in-plane exchange fields. We find an interesting interplay between the superconducting phase difference and the relative orientation of the exchange fields, manifested in the Josephson current across the junction. Specifically, this may be written IJC=(I0+Imcosφ)sinΔθ, where I0 and Im are constants, and φ is the relative orientation of the exchange fields, while Δθ is the superconducting phase difference. Similar results have recently been obtained in other superconductor-insulator-superconductor junctions coexisting with helimagnetic or ferromagnetic order. We calculate the superconducting order parameter self-consistently, and investigate quantitatively the effect which the misaligned exchange fields constitute on the Josephson current, to see if Im may have an appreciable effect on the Josephson current. It is found that I0 and Im become comparable in magnitude at sufficiently low temperatures and fields close to the critical value, in agreement with previous work. From our analytical results, it then follows that the Josephson current in the present system may be controlled in a well-defined manner by a rotation of the exchange fields on both sides of the junction. We discuss a possible experimental realization of this proposition.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| UGe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| URhGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| ZrZn2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity in magnetic multipole states
similarity 0.94Shuntaro Sumita & Youichi Yanase
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ferromagnetic Superconductivity Driven by Changing Fermi Surface Topology
similarity 0.94K. G. Sandeman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effects in a spin-triplet superconductor–ferromagnet heterostucture with a spin-active interface
similarity 0.93Damien Terrade et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-Transfer and Exchange Torques in Ferromagnetic Superconductors
similarity 0.93Jacob Linder et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Breakdown of the coexistence of spin-singlet superconductivity and itinerant ferromagnetism
similarity 0.93R. Shen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase transitions in the domain structure of ferromagnetic superconductors
similarity 0.93I. M. Khaymovich et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified