← Back to search

Sharp increase of microwave absorption due to shaking of Josephson vortices in BiSCCO superconductor

D. Shaltiel, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, A. Loidl, B. Rosenstein, B. Ya. Shapiro, I. Shapiro, T. Tamegai, B. Bogoslavsky

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.014508 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We study microwave (9.36GHz) dissipation in the layered, highly anisotropic superconductors Bi2212 and Bi2223 subjected to a constant magnetic field parallel to the layers. The signal has a characteristic magnetic field dependence, increasing linearly at small fields, reaching a maximum, and decreasing at large fields. We demonstrate experimentally that the microwave absorption is strongly enhanced by application of a low frequency ac magnetic field parallel to the static field. The results are interpreted in the framework of Josephson phase electrodynamics in layered superconductors. In particular, the enhancement is explained as a result of the depinning of the Josephson vortices by the ac field shaking. The theoretical dc field dependence of the microwave absorption for Hdc⪢Hac is in good agreement with experiment. The magnitude of the microwave signal increases rapidly with the anisotropy of the superconductor.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers