Anomalous superconductivity and its competition with antiferromagnetism in doped Mott insulators
S. S. Kancharla, B. Kyung, D. Sénéchal, M. Civelli, M. Capone, G. Kotliar, A.-M. S. Tremblay
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.184516 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Proximity to a Mott insulating phase is likely to be an important physical ingredient of a theory that aims to describe high-temperature superconductivity in the cuprates. Quantum cluster methods are well suited to describe the Mott phase. Hence, as a step toward a quantitative theory of the competition between antiferromagnetism and d-wave superconductivity in the cuprates, we use cellular dynamical mean-field theory to compute zero-temperature properties of the two-dimensional square lattice Hubbard model. The d-wave order parameter is found to scale like the superexchange coupling J for on-site interaction U comparable to or larger than the bandwidth. The order parameter also assumes a dome shape as a function of doping, while, by contrast, the gap in the single-particle density of states decreases monotonically with increasing doping. In the presence of a finite second neighbor hopping t′, the zero-temperature phase diagram displays the electron-hole asymmetric competition between antiferromagnetism and superconductivity that is observed experimentally in the cuprates. Adding realistic third neighbor hopping t″ improves the overall agreement with the experimental phase diagram. Since band parameters can vary depending on the specific cuprate considered, the sensitivity of the theoretical phase diagram to band parameters challenges the commonly held assumption that the doping vs Tc∕Tcmax phase diagram of the cuprates is universal. The calculated angle-resolved photoemission spectrum displays the observed electron-hole asymmetry. The tendency to homogeneous coexistence of the superconducting and antiferromagnetic order parameters is stronger than observed in most experiments but consistent with many theoretical results and with experiments in some layered high-temperature superconductors. Clearly, our calculations reproduce important features of d-wave superconductivity in the cuprates that would otherwise be considered anomalous from the point of view of the standard Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer approach. At strong coupling, d-wave superconductivity and antiferromagnetism naturally appear as two equally important competing instabilities of the normal phase of the same underlying Hamiltonian.
Similar papers
Antiferromagnetic to superconducting phase transition in the hole- and electron-doped Hubbard model at zero temperature
similarity 0.93M. Aichhorn et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antagonistic effects of nearest-neighbor repulsion on the superconducting pairing dynamics in the doped Mott insulator regime
similarity 0.92A. Reymbaut et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous superconductivity and its competition with antiferromagnetism in doped Mott insulators
similarity 0.92S. S. Kancharla et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0508205
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model with cellular dynamical mean-field theory: A quantum impurity model analysis
similarity 0.92C. Walsh et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competition between Antiferromagnetism and Superconductivity in High Cuprates
similarity 0.91David Senechal et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0410162
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiferromagnetism and Tightly Bound Cooper Pairs Induced by Kinetic Frustration
similarity 0.91Yixin Zhang et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2506.16464
Source status unknown — claims are unverified