← Back to search

Skyrmion versus vortex flux lattices in p-wave superconductors

Qi Li, John Toner, D. Belitz

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.014517 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

p-wave superconductors allow for topological defects known as skyrmions, in addition to the usual vortices that are possible in both s-wave and p-wave materials. In strongly type-II superconductors in a magnetic field, a skyrmion flux lattice yields a lower free energy than the Abrikosov flux lattice of vortices and should thus be realized in p-wave superconductors. We analytically calculate the energy per skyrmion, which agrees very well with numerical results. From this, we obtain the magnetic induction B as a function of the external magnetic field H and the elastic constants of the skyrmion lattice near the lower critical field Hc1. Together with the Lindemann criterion, these results suffice in predicting the melting curve of the skyrmion lattice. We find a striking difference in the melting curves of vortex and skyrmion lattices: while the former is separated at all temperatures from the Meissner phase by a vortex liquid phase, the skyrmion lattice phase shares a direct boundary with the Meissner phase. That is, skyrmion lattices never melt near Hc1 while vortex lattices always melt sufficiently close to Hc1. This allows for a very simple test for the existence of a skyrmion lattice. Possible muon spin rotation experiments to detect skyrmion lattices are also discussed.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers