Microscopic gauge-invariant theory of the c-axis infrared response of bilayer cuprate superconductors and the origin of the superconductivity-induced absorption bands
Jiří Chaloupka, Christian Bernhard, Dominik Munzar
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.184513 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report on results of our theoretical study of the c-axis infrared conductivity of bilayer high-Tc cuprate superconductors using a microscopic model involving the bilayer-split (bonding and antibonding) bands. An emphasis is on the gauge invariance of the theory, which turns out to be essential for the physical understanding of the electrodynamics of these compounds. The description of the optical response involves local (intrabilayer and interbilayer) current densities and local conductivities. The local conductivities are obtained using a microscopic theory, where the quasiparticles of the two bands are coupled to spin fluctuations. The coupling leads to superconductivity and is described at the level of generalized Eliashberg theory. Also addressed is the simpler case of quasiparticles coupled by a separable and nonretarded interaction. The gauge invariance of the theory is achieved by including a suitable class of vertex corrections. The resulting response of the model is studied in detail and an interpretation of two superconductivity-induced peaks in the experimental data of the real part of the c-axis conductivity is proposed. The peak around 400 cm−1 is attributed to a collective mode of the intrabilayer regions, which is an analog of the Bogolyubov-Anderson mode playing a crucial role in the theory of the longitudinal response of superconductors. For small values of the bilayer splitting, its nature is similar to that of the transverse plasmon of the phenomenological Josephson superlattice model. The peak around 1000 cm−1 is interpreted as a pair-breaking feature that is related to the electronic coupling through the spacing layers separating the bilayers.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Anomalous far-infrared monochromatic transmission through a film of type-II superconductor in magnetic field
similarity 0.97Oleg L. Berman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical control of the current-voltage relation in stacked superconductors
similarity 0.97Frank Schlawin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conversion of Terahertz Wave Polarization at the Boundary of a Layered Superconductor due to the Resonance Excitation of Oblique Surface Waves
similarity 0.97Yu. O. Averkov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weak-coupling model of spin fluctuations in the superconducting state of the layered cuprates
similarity 0.96N. Bulut & D. J. Scalapino
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for site-centered stripes from magnetic excitations in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.96Martin Greiter & Holger Schmidt
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
(Ir)Relevance of Disorder for Superconductivity in Cuprates
similarity 0.96R. Caruso et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified