Spin screening effect in superconductor/ferromagnet thin film heterostructures studied using nuclear magnetic resonance
R. I. Salikhov, N. N. Garif’yanov, I. A. Garifullin, L. R. Tagirov, K. Westerholt, H. Zabel
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.214523 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Using NMR spectroscopy of the V51 nuclei in the superconducting state of Ni/V/Ni and Pd1−xFex/V/Pd1−xFex trilayers we reported in a recent letter an experimental observation of the spin screening effect [R. I. Salikhov, I. A. Garifullin, N. N. Garif’yanov, L. R. Tagirov, K. Theis-Bröhl, K. Westerholt, and H. Zabel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 087003 (2009)]. This effect, which designates the formation of a spin polarization in the superconducting state, was predicted previously by Bergeret et al. [F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, EPL 66, 111 (2004); Phys. Rev. B 69, 174504 (2004)]. Here, we extend our earlier experiments by varying the thickness of the superconducting V layer and by applying the magnetic field not only perpendicular to the film plane as in the previous experiments, but also in the parallel direction. For the latter geometry, which for experimental reasons is difficult to realize, the film is in the vortex-free state. This allows a direct quantitative comparison of the experimental screening effect as derived from a characteristic distortion of the high-field wing of the resonance line in the superconducting state and the theoretical model calculations. We derive a reasonable agreement between theory and experiment, confirming the spin screening effect in the superconductor.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Inverse spin switch effects in ferromagnet-superconductor-ferromagnet trilayers with strong ferromagnets
similarity 0.96A. Yu. Rusanov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Combined experimental and theoretical study of field and current conditioning in magnetically shielded superconducting films
similarity 0.95Ch. Jooss et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental Observation of the Spin Screening Effect in Superconductor/Ferromagnet Thin Film Heterostructures
similarity 0.95R. I. Salikhov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic theory of superconductor-ferroelectric heterostructures: Interface charge redistribution
similarity 0.95N. Pavlenko & F. Schwabl
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nanoscale ferromagnet-superconductor-ferromagnet switches controlled by magnetization orientation
similarity 0.95Klaus Halterman & Oriol T. Valls
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling-induced superconductivity in layered systems
similarity 0.95Z. Gedik & S. Ciraci
Source status unknown — claims are unverified