Josephson phase qubit with an optimal point
Norihito Kosugi, Shigemasa Matsuo, Toshiyuki Fujii, Noriyuki Hatakenaka
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.024507 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Current fluctuations in a Josephson phase qubit are considered to be a source of decoherence, especially for pure dephasing. One possible way of evading such decoherence is to employ an optimal operation point as used in flux and charge qubits, where the qubit is insensitive to the bias fluctuations. However, there is no optimal point in a phase qubit since qubit energy splitting becomes monotonically smaller with increasing the bias current. Here we propose a phase qubit with an optimal point by introducing qubit energy splitting that depends nonmonotonically on the current bias realized in capacitively coupled Josephson junctions. The effect of junction asymmetry on the optimal point is also investigated.
Similar papers
Josephson junctions with tunable current-phase relation
similarity 0.88A. Lipman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time-optimal performance of Josephson charge qubits: A process tomography approach
similarity 0.88Robert Roloff & Walter Pötz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Noise and quantum measurements in a circular Josephson array qubit
similarity 0.88Joachim Sjöstrand & Anders Karlhede
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum noise in the Josephson charge qubit
similarity 0.87O. Astafiev et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411216
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Method for reliable realization of a φ Josephson junction
similarity 0.87N. G. Pugach et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson diode effect derived from short-range coherent coupling
similarity 0.87Sadashige Matsuo et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.07923
Source status unknown — claims are unverified