← Back to search

Phonons and superconductivity in fcc and dhcp lanthanum

S. Bağcı, H. M. Tütüncü, S. Duman, G. P. Srivastava

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.144507 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We have investigated the structural and electronic properties of lanthanum in the face-centered-cubic (fcc) and double hexagonal-close-packed (dhcp) phases using a generalized gradient approximation of the density functional theory and the ab initio pseudopotential method. It is found that double hexagonal-close-packed is the more stable phase for lanthanum. Differences in the density of states at the Fermi level between these two phases are pointed out and discussed in detail. Using the calculated lattice constant and electronic band structure for both phases, a linear response approach based on the density functional theory has been applied to study phonon modes, polarization characteristics of phonon modes, and electron-phonon interaction. Our phonon results show a softening behavior of the transverse acoustic branch along the Γ−L direction and the Γ−M direction for face-centered-cubic and double hexagonal-close-packed phases, respectively. Thus, the transverse-phonon linewidth shows a maximum at the zone boundary M(L) for the double hexagonal-close-packed phase (face-centered-cubic phase), where the transverse-phonon branch exhibits a dip. The electron-phonon coupling parameter λ is found to be 0.97 (1.06) for the double hexagonal-close-packed phase (face-centered-cubic phase), and the superconducting critical temperature is estimated to be 4.87 (dhcp) and 5.88 K (fcc), in good agreement with experimental values of around 5.0 (dhcp) and 6.0 K (fcc). A few superconducting parameters for the double hexagonal-close-packed phase have been calculated and compared with available theoretical and experimental results. Furthermore, the calculated superconducting parameters for both phases are compared between each other in detail.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.88Pressure not reportedunknown
La

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.87Pressure not reportedunknown
La

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6Pressure not reportedunknown
La

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers