Crossed Andreev reflection versus electron transfer in three-terminal graphene devices
Håvard Haugen, Daniel Huertas-Hernando, Arne Brataas, Xavier Waintal
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.174523 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the transport properties of three-terminal graphene devices, where one terminal is superconducting and two are normal metals. The terminals are connected by nanoribbons. Electron transfer (ET) and crossed Andreev reflection (CAR) are identified via the nonlocal signal between the two normal terminals. Analytical expressions for ET and CAR in symmetric devices are found. We compute ET and CAR numerically for asymmetric devices. ET dominates CAR in symmetric devices, but CAR can dominate ET in asymmetric devices, where only the zero-energy modes of the zigzag nanoribbons contribute to the transport.
Similar papers
Crossed Andreev reflection at spin-active interfaces
similarity 0.93Mikhail S. Kalenkov & Andrei D. Zaikin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossed Andreev reflection in a zigzag graphene nanoribbon-superconductor junction
similarity 0.91J. Wang & S. Liu
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Controllable Andreev Retroreflection and Specular Andreev Reflection in a Four-Terminal Graphene-Superconductor Hybrid System
similarity 0.90Shu-guang Cheng et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-switch effect from crossed Andreev reflection in superconducting graphene spin valves
similarity 0.90Jacob Linder et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proposal for an All-Electrical Detection of Crossed Andreev Reflection in Topological Insulators
similarity 0.89Rolf W. Reinthaler et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resonant tunneling through superconducting double barrier structures in graphene
similarity 0.89Arijit Kundu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified