← Back to search

Possible evidence of a two-gap structure for the CuxTiSe2 superconductor

Moran Zaberchik, Khanan Chashka, Larisa Patlgan, Ariel Maniv, Chris Baines, Philip King, Amit Kanigel

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.220505 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report a comprehensive transverse-field μSR study of CuxTiSe2. The magnetic penetration depth was found to saturate at low temperature as expected in an s-wave superconductor. As x is increased we find that the superfluid density increases and the size of the superconducting gap, calculated from the temperature dependence of the superfluid density, is approaching the BCS value. However, for low values of x, the gap is smaller than the weak-coupling BCS prediction suggesting that two superconducting gaps are present in the sample.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CuxTiSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.17Pressure not reportedunknown
Cu0.081TiSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.17Pressure not reportedunknown
Cu0.057TiSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.7Pressure not reportedunknown
Cu0.044TiSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.5Pressure not reportedunknown
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
NbSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers