Disorder-dependent superconducting phase diagram at high magnetic fields in Fe1+ySexTe1−x (x∼0.4)
T. Gebre, G. Li, J. B. Whalen, B. S. Conner, H. D. Zhou, G. Grissonnanche, M. K. Kostov, A. Gurevich, T. Siegrist, L. Balicas
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.174517 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We compare the superconducting phase-diagram under high magnetic fields (up to H=45 T) of Fe1+ySe0.4Te0.6 single crystals originally grown by the Bridgman-Stockbarger (BRST) technique, which were annealed to display narrow superconducting transitions and the optimal transition temperature Tc≳14 K, with the diagram for samples of similar stoichiometry grown by the traveling-solvent floating-zone technique as well as with the phase diagram reported for crystals grown by a self-flux method. We find that the so-annealed samples tend to display higher ratios Hc2/Tc, particularly for fields applied along the interplanar direction, where the upper critical field Hc2(T) exhibits a pronounced concave down curvature followed by saturation at lower temperatures T. This last observation is consistent with previous studies indicating that this system is Pauli limited. An analysis of our Hc2(T) data using a multiband theory suggests the emergence of the Fulde-Ferrel-Larkin-Ovchnikov state at low temperatures. A detailed structural x-ray analysis, reveals no impurity phases but an appreciable degree of mosaicity in as-grown BRST single crystals that remains unaffected by the annealing process. Energy-dispersive x-ray analysis showed that the annealed samples have a more homogeneous stoichiometric distribution of both Fe and Se with virtually the same content of interstitial Fe as the nonannealed ones. Thus we conclude that the excess of Fe, in contrast to structural disorder, contributes to the decrease of the superconducting upper-critical fields of this series. Finally, a scaling analysis of the fluctuation conductivity in the superconducting critical regime, suggests that the superconducting fluctuations have a two-dimensional character in this system.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe1+ySe0.4Te0.6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| Fe1+ySe0.4Te0.6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 36.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Fe1.03Te0.7Se0.3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Fe1.05Te0.89Se0.11 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Fe1.11Te0.6Se0.4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 39 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Fe1.13Se0.45Te0.55 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
Similar papers
Bulk superconductivity at 14 K in single crystals of Fe1+yTexSe1−x
similarity 0.96B. C. Sales et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible nodal superconducting gap in Fe1+y(Te1−xSex) single crystals from ultralow temperature penetration depth measurements
similarity 0.96Andrei Diaconu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robustness of superconducting properties to transition metal substitution and impurity phases in Fe1−xVxSe
similarity 0.96Franziska K. K. Kirschner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robustness of superconductivity to competing magnetic phases in tetragonal FeS
similarity 0.96Franziska K. K. Kirschner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structural and superconducting properties of MgB2−xBex
similarity 0.96J. S. Ahn et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weak anisotropy of the superconducting upper critical field in Fe1.11Te0.6Se0.4 single crystals
similarity 0.96Minghu Fang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified