← Back to search

Domain structure and magnetic pinning in ferromagnetic/superconducting hybrids

V. Vlasko-Vlasov, A. Buzdin, A. Melnikov, U. Welp, D. Rosenmann, L. Uspenskaya, V. Fratello, W. Kwok

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.064505 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Magnetic patterns in three iron-garnet films with different magnetic properties covered with 100-nm superconducting Nb film are studied using a magneto-optical imaging technique. In all samples the strong coupling between ferromagnetic domains and vortices noticeably modifies the magnetization process. However, depending on the type and width of the magnetic domains, we observe different flux dynamics in the Nb film. Wide domains give rise to a combined domain structure and type I–like superconducting response resulting in enhanced attenuation of the flux motion due to cooperative pinning of vortices and magnetic domain walls. These combined domains strongly shrink in the ac fields due to a dynamic instability triggered by oscillating domain walls. Combined domains formed on narrow magnetic domains do not shrink but they guide the motion of vortices and, in turn, align in the vortex motion direction. This introduces superconducting current anisotropy due to strong pinning on the magnetic domain walls. Irregular magnetic domain structures with immobilized domain walls stochastically modify the vortex entry patterns. The presence of magnetic domains essentially arrests thermomagnetic avalanches in the superconducting layer. The studied magnetic pinning has a good potential for slowing down vortices in high-Tc superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

8.5Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers