Superconductivity suppression of Ba0.5K0.5Fe2−2xM2xAs2 single crystals by substitution of transition metal (M = Mn, Ru, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn)
J. Li, Y. F. Guo, S. B. Zhang, J. Yuan, Y. Tsujimoto, X. Wang, C. I. Sathish, Y. Sun, S. Yu, W. Yi, K. Yamaura, E. Takayama-Muromachiu, Y. Shirako, M. Akaogi, H. Kontani
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.214509 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigated the doping effects of magnetic and nonmagnetic impurities in single-crystalline p-type Ba0.5K0.5Fe2−2xM2xAs2 (M = Mn, Ru, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn) superconductors. The superconductivity is maintained robustly with the impurity Ru, and weakly with the impurities Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn. However, the present Tc suppression rate of both magnetic and nonmagnetic impurities remains much lower than what was expected for the s±-wave model. The temperature dependence of resistivity data shows an obvious low-T upturn for the crystals doped with high levels of impurity, which is due to the occurrence of localization. Thus, the relatively weak Tc suppression effect from Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn is considered to be a result of localization rather than the pair-breaking effect in the s±-wave model.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ba0.5K0.5Fe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37.78 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba0.5K0.5Fe1.922Mn0.078As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.53 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba0.5K0.5Fe1.936Ru0.064As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37.14 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba0.5K0.5Fe1.896Co0.104As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30.31 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba0.5K0.5Fe1.922Ni0.078As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26.75 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba0.5K0.5Fe1.912Cu0.088As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 22.29 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba0.5K0.5Fe1.92Zn0.08As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30.15 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Effect of pressure on the structural phase transition and superconductivity in (Ba1−xKx)Fe2As2 (x=0 and 0.45) and SrFe2As2 single crystals
similarity 0.95M. S. Torikachvili et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low-temperature transport properties of doped Ba0.57K0.43Fe2As2 superconductors in high magnetic field
similarity 0.95Yueshen Wu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of superconductivity and antiferromagnetic order in Ba(Fe0.92−xCo0.08Vx)2As2
similarity 0.94Jieming Sheng et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competing superconducting and magnetic order parameters and field-induced magnetism in electron-doped Ba(Fe1−xCox)2As2
similarity 0.94J. Larsen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fully-gapped superconductivity in Ba0.55K0.45Fe1.95Co0.05As2: A low-temperature specific heat study
similarity 0.94K. Gofryk et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport and anisotropy in single-crystalline SrFe2As2 and A0.6K0.4Fe2As2 (A=Sr, Ba) superconductors
similarity 0.94G. F. Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified