← Back to search

Effect of Ru substitution on atomic displacements in the layered SmFe1−xRuxAsO0.85F0.15 superconductor

A. Iadecola, B. Joseph, L. Simonelli, L. Maugeri, M. Fratini, A. Martinelli, A. Palenzona, M. Putti, N. L. Saini

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.214530 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The effect of Ru substitution on the local structure of layered SmFe1−xRuxAsO0.85F0.15 superconductor has been studied by As K- and Sm L3-edge x-ray-absorption spectroscopy. The extended x-ray-absorption fine-structure measurements reveal distinct Fe-As and Ru-As bond lengths in the Ru substituted samples with the latter being ∼0.03 Å longer. Local disorder induced by the Ru substitution is mainly confined to the FeAs layer while the SmO spacer layer sustains a relative order, consistent with the x-ray-absorption near-edge structure spectra. The results suggest that, in addition to the order/disorder in the active FeAs layer, its coupling to the rare-earth–oxygen spacer layer needs to be considered for describing the electronic properties of these layered superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
SmFe1-xRuxAsO0.85F0.15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

51Pressure not reportedunknown
SmFe1-xRuxAsO0.85F0.15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

14Pressure not reportedunknown
SmFe1-xRuxAsO0.85F0.15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

8Pressure not reportedunknown
SmFeAsO1-xFx

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

55Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers