Proximity effects and triplet correlations in ferromagnet/ferromagnet/superconductor nanostructures
Chien-Te Wu, Oriol T. Valls, Klaus Halterman
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.014523 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report the results of a study of superconducting proximity effects in clean ferromagnet/ferromagnet/superconductor (F1F2S) heterostructures, where the pairing state in S is a conventional singlet s-wave. We numerically find the self-consistent solutions of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) equations and use these solutions to calculate the relevant physical quantities. By linearizing the BdG equations, we obtain the superconducting transition temperatures Tc as a function of the angle α between the exchange fields in F1 and F2. We find that the results for Tc(α) in F1F2S systems are clearly different from those in F1SF2 systems, where Tc monotonically increases with α and is highest for antiparallel magnetizations. Here, Tc(α) is in general a nonmonotonic function, and often has a minimum near α≈80∘. For certain values of the exchange field and layer thicknesses, the system exhibits reentrant superconductivity with α: it transitions from superconducting to normal, and then returns to a superconducting state again with increasing α. This phenomenon is substantiated by a calculation of the condensation energy. We compute, in addition to the ordinary singlet pair amplitude, the induced odd triplet pairing amplitudes. The results indicate a connection between equal-spin triplet pairing and the singlet pairing state that characterizes Tc. We find also that the induced triplet amplitudes can be very long ranged in both the S and F sides and characterize their range. We discuss the average density of states for both the magnetic and the S regions, and its relation to the pairing amplitudes and Tc. The local magnetization vector, which exhibits reverse proximity effects, is also investigated.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ho Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Curvature control of the superconducting proximity effect in diffusive ferromagnetic nanowires
similarity 0.96Tancredi Salamone et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnon-Fluxon Interaction in Coupled Superconductor/Ferromagnet Hybrid Periodic Structures
similarity 0.96B. Niedzielski et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effects in conical-ferromagnet/superconductor bilayers
similarity 0.95Chien-Te Wu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Inverse proximity effect in s-wave and d-wave superconductors coupled to topological insulators
similarity 0.95Henning G. Hugdal et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonreciprocal electron transport in finite-size superconductor/ferromagnet bilayers with strong spin-orbit coupling
similarity 0.95A. V. Putilov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetization in uniaxial type-II superconductors
similarity 0.94Hiroaki Matsueda & Kenji Takanaka
Source status unknown — claims are unverified