← Back to search

Electronic structure and fermiology of superconducting LaNiGa2

David J. Singh

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.174507 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report electronic structure calculations for the layered centrosymmetric superconductor LaNiGa2, which has been identified as having a possible triplet state based on evidence for time reversal symmetry breaking. The Fermi surface has several large sheets and is only moderately anisotropic, so that the material is best described as a three-dimensional metal. These include sections that are open in the in-plane direction as well as a section that approaches the zone center. The density of states is high and primarily derived from Ga p states, which hybridize with Ni d states. Comparing with experimental specific heat data, we infer a superconducting λ≤0.55, which implies that this is a weak to intermediate coupling material. However, the Ni occurs in a nominal d10 configuration in this material, which places the compound far from magnetism. Implications of these results for superconductivity are discussed.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
LaNiGa2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2Pressure not reportedunknown
LaNiGa2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.01Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
LaNiGa2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.1Pressure not reportedonset
LaNiGa2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.97Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers