← Back to search

s-wave superconductivity in superconducting BaTi2Sb2O revealed by 121/123Sb-NMR/nuclear quadrupole resonance measurements

S. Kitagawa, K. Ishida, K. Nakano, T. Yajima, H. Kageyama

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.060510 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report the 121/123Sb-NMR/nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) measurements on the superconductor BaTi2Sb2O with a two-dimensional Ti2O square-net layer formed with Ti3+ (3d1). NQR measurements revealed that the in-plane four-fold symmetry is broken at the Sb site below TA∼40 K, without an internal field appearing at the Sb site. These exclude a spin-density wave (SDW)/ charge density wave (CDW) ordering with incommensurate correlations, but can be understood with the commensurate CDW ordering at TA. The spin-lattice relaxation rate 1/T1, measured at the four-fold symmetry breaking site, decreases below superconducting (SC) transition temperature Tc, indicative of the microscopic coexistence of superconductivity and the CDW/SDW phase below TA. Furthermore, 1/T1 of 121Sb-NQR shows a coherence peak just below Tc and decreases exponentially at low temperatures. These results are in sharp contrast with those in cuprate and iron-based superconductors, and strongly suggest that its SC symmetry is classified to an ordinary s-wave state.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
BaTi2Sb2O

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.95Pressure not reportedonset
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
NbSe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

7Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers