← Back to search

Discerning electronic fingerprints of nodal and antinodal nestings and their phase coherences in doped cuprate superconductors

Tanmoy Das

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.144505 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The complexity of competing orders in cuprates has recently been multiplied by a number of bulk evidences of charge ordering with wave vector that connects the antinodal region of the Fermi surface. This result contradicts many spectroscopic results of the nodal nesting. To resolve this issue, we carry out a unified study of the resulting electronic fingerprints of both nodal and antinodal nestings (NNs/ANs) and compare with angle-resolved photoemission, scanning tunneling spectroscopic data, as well as bulk-sensitive Hall-effect measurements. Our result makes several definitive distinctions between them in that while both nestings gap out the antinodal region, AN induces an additional quasiparticle gap below the Fermi level along the nodal direction, which is so far uncharted in spectroscopic data. Furthermore, we show that the Hall coefficient in the AN state obtains a discontinuous jump at the phase transition from an electronlike nodal pocket (negative value) to a large holelike Fermi surface (positive value), in contrast to a continuous transition in the available data. We conclude that individual NNs and ANs have difficulties in explaining all of the data. In this spirit, we study a possibility of coexisting NN and AN phases within a Ginsburg-Landau functional formalism. An interesting possibility of disorder pinned “chiral” charge ordering is finally discussed.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBa2Cu3O6+x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O6.3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Ca1.88Na0.12CuO2Cl2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2Dy0.2Ca0.8Cu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O6.51

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers