← Back to search

Distinguishing s± and s++ electron pairing symmetries by neutron spin resonance in superconducting NaFe0.935Co0.045As

Chenglin Zhang, H.-F. Li, Yu Song, Yixi Su, Guotai Tan, Tucker Netherton, Caleb Redding, Scott V. Carr, Oleg Sobolev, Astrid Schneidewind, Enrico Faulhaber, L. W. Harriger, Shiliang Li, Xingye Lu, Dao-Xin Yao, Tanmoy Das, A. V. Balatsky, Th. Brückel, J. W. Lynn, Pengcheng Dai

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.064504 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

A determination of the superconducting (SC) electron pairing symmetry forms the basis for establishing a microscopic mechanism for superconductivity. For iron pnictide superconductors, the s±-pairing symmetry theory predicts the presence of a sharp neutron spin resonance at an energy below the sum of hole and electron SC gap energies (E≤2Δ) below Tc. On the other hand, the s++-pairing symmetry expects a broad spin excitation enhancement at an energy above 2Δ below Tc. Although the resonance has been observed in iron pnictide superconductors at an energy below 2Δ consistent with the s±-pairing symmetry, the mode has also been interpreted as arising from the s++-pairing symmetry with E≥2Δ due to its broad energy width and the large uncertainty in determining the SC gaps. Here we use inelastic neutron scattering to reveal a sharp resonance at E=7 meV in SC NaFe0.935Co0.045As (Tc=18 K). On warming towards Tc, the mode energy hardly softens while its energy width increases rapidly. By comparing with calculated spin-excitation spectra within the s± and s++-pairing symmetries, we conclude that the ground-state resonance in NaFe0.935Co0.045As is only consistent with the s± pairing, and is inconsistent with the s++-pairing symmetry.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
NaFe0.935Co0.045As

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

18Pressure not reportedonset
NaFe0.935Co0.045As

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

18Pressure not reportedonset
NaFe0.935Co0.045As

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

18Pressure not reportedonset
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
FeTe0.6Se0.4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
NaFe0.95Co0.05As

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
BaFe1.85Co0.15As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

25Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers