Light-superconducting interference devices
Frans Godschalk, Yuli V. Nazarov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.104502 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently, we have proposed the half-Josephson laser (HJL): a device that combines lasing with superconducting leads, providing a locking between the optical phase and the superconducting phase difference between the leads. In this work, we propose and investigate two setups derived from a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), where two conventional Josephson junctions are replaced by two HJLs. In the first setup, the HJLs share the same resonant mode, while in the second setup two separate resonant modes of the two lasers are coupled optically. We dub the setup “light-superconducting interference device” (LSID). In both setups, we find the operating regimes similar to those of a single HJL. Importantly, the steady lasing field is significantly affected by the magnetic flux penetrating the SQUID loop, with respect to both amplitude and phase. This provides opportunities to tune or even quench the lasing by varying a small magnetic field. For the second setup, we find a parameter range where the evolution equation for the laser fields supports periodic cycles. The fields are thus modulated with the frequency of the cycle resulting in an emission spectrum consisting of a set of discrete modes. From this spectrum, two modes dominate in the limit of strong optical coupling. Therefore, the LSID can be also used to generate such modulated light.
Similar papers
Tunable coupling engineering between superconducting resonators: From sidebands to effective gauge fields
similarity 0.86Borja Peropadre et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coupled superconducting qudit-resonator system: Energy spectrum, state population, and state transition under microwave drive
similarity 0.86W. Y. Liu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum behavior of a dc SQUID phase qubit
similarity 0.85Kaushik Mitra et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-photon coupling via Josephson element I: Breaking the symmetry with magnetic fields
similarity 0.85E. V. Stolyarov et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2412.05016
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson diode effect in monolithic dc-SQUIDs based on 3D Dayem nanobridges
similarity 0.85Angelo Greco et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.12765
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non−Φ0−periodic macroscopic quantum interference in one-dimensional parallel Josephson junction arrays with unconventional grating structure
similarity 0.84J. Oppenländer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified