← Back to search

Nernst effect in the electron-doped cuprate superconductor Pr2−xCexCuO4: Superconducting fluctuations, upper critical field Hc2, and the origin of the Tc dome

F. F. Tafti, F. Laliberté, M. Dion, J. Gaudet, P. Fournier, Louis Taillefer

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.024519 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The Nernst effect was measured in the electron-doped cuprate superconductor Pr2−xCexCuO4 (PCCO) at four concentrations, from underdoped (x=0.13) to overdoped (x=0.17), for a wide range of temperatures above the critical temperature Tc. A magnetic field H up to 15 T was used to reliably access the normal-state quasiparticle contribution to the Nernst signal Nqp, which is subtracted from the total signal N, to obtain the superconducting contribution Nsc. As a function of H, Nsc peaks at a field H☆ whose temperature dependence obeys Hc2☆ln(T/Tc), as it does in a conventional superconductor such as NbxSi1−x. The doping dependence of the characteristic field scale Hc2☆, shown to be closely related to the upper critical field Hc2, tracks the domelike dependence of Tc, showing that superconductivity is weakened below the quantum critical point where the Fermi surface is reconstructed, presumably by the onset of antiferromagnetic order. Our data at all dopings are quantitatively consistent with the theory of Gaussian superconducting fluctuations, eliminating the need to invoke unusual vortexlike excitations above Tc, and ruling out phase fluctuations as the mechanism for the fall of Tc with underdoping. We compare the properties of PCCO with those of hole-doped cuprates and conclude that the domes of Tc and Hc2 versus doping in the latter materials are also controlled predominantly by phase competition rather than phase fluctuations.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Pr2-xCexCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Pr1.87Ce0.13CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

8.8Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Pr1.86Ce0.14CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

17.4Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

19.5Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Pr1.83Ce0.17CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

13.4Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
La2-xSrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3Oy

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
HgBa2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
La2-x-yEuySrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
NbxSi1-x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers