Nernst effect in the electron-doped cuprate superconductor Pr2−xCexCuO4: Superconducting fluctuations, upper critical field Hc2, and the origin of the Tc dome
F. F. Tafti, F. Laliberté, M. Dion, J. Gaudet, P. Fournier, Louis Taillefer
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.024519 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Nernst effect was measured in the electron-doped cuprate superconductor Pr2−xCexCuO4 (PCCO) at four concentrations, from underdoped (x=0.13) to overdoped (x=0.17), for a wide range of temperatures above the critical temperature Tc. A magnetic field H up to 15 T was used to reliably access the normal-state quasiparticle contribution to the Nernst signal Nqp, which is subtracted from the total signal N, to obtain the superconducting contribution Nsc. As a function of H, Nsc peaks at a field H☆ whose temperature dependence obeys Hc2☆ln(T/Tc), as it does in a conventional superconductor such as NbxSi1−x. The doping dependence of the characteristic field scale Hc2☆, shown to be closely related to the upper critical field Hc2, tracks the domelike dependence of Tc, showing that superconductivity is weakened below the quantum critical point where the Fermi surface is reconstructed, presumably by the onset of antiferromagnetic order. Our data at all dopings are quantitatively consistent with the theory of Gaussian superconducting fluctuations, eliminating the need to invoke unusual vortexlike excitations above Tc, and ruling out phase fluctuations as the mechanism for the fall of Tc with underdoping. We compare the properties of PCCO with those of hole-doped cuprates and conclude that the domes of Tc and Hc2 versus doping in the latter materials are also controlled predominantly by phase competition rather than phase fluctuations.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pr2-xCexCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Pr1.87Ce0.13CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8.8 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Pr1.86Ce0.14CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17.4 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 19.5 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Pr1.83Ce0.17CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.4 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| HgBa2CuO4+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-x-yEuySrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbxSi1-x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Nernst Effect Measurements of Epitaxial Y0.95Ca0.05Ba2(Cu1−xZnx)3Oy and Y0.9Ca0.1Ba2Cu3Oy Superconducting Films
similarity 0.95I. Kokanović et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of charge carrier interaction above Tc in the Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4+δ superconductor
similarity 0.95M. Scavini et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Nernst Effect in Poor Conductors and in the Cuprate Superconductors”
similarity 0.95Cigdem Capan & Kamran Behnia
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nernst and Seebeck Coefficients of the Cuprate Superconductor YBa2Cu3O6.67: A Study of Fermi Surface Reconstruction
similarity 0.94J. Chang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nernst effect in the electron-doped cuprate superconductor PCCO: Superconducting fluctuations, upper critical field Hc2, and the origin of the Tc dome
similarity 0.94F. F. Tafti et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1405.6248
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory for high-Tc superconductors considering inhomogeneous charge distribution
similarity 0.94E. V. L. de Mello et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified