Anisotropic criteria for the type of superconductivity
V. G. Kogan, R. Prozorov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.054516 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The classical criterion for classification of superconductors as type I or type II based on the isotropic Ginzburg-Landau theory is generalized to arbitrary temperatures for materials with anisotropic Fermi surfaces and order parameters. We argue that the relevant quantity for this classification is the ratio of the upper and thermodynamic critical fields Hc2/Hc, rather than the traditional ratio of the penetration depth and the coherence length λ/ξ. Even in the isotropic case, Hc2/Hc coincides with 2λ/ξ only at the critical temperature Tc and they differ as T decreases, the long-known fact. Anisotropies of Fermi surfaces and order parameters may amplify this difference and render false the criterion based on the value of κ=λ/ξ.
Similar papers
Anisotropic criteria for the type of superconductivity
similarity 0.92V. G. Kogan & R. Prozorov · 2014 · arXiv:1407.6647
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Niobium in clean limit: an intrinsic type-I superconductor
similarity 0.89Ruslan Prozorov et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.11829
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic Superconductors Between Types I and II
similarity 0.88T. T. Saraiva et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1902.09018
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Orbital upper critical field and its anisotropy of clean one- and two-band superconductors
similarity 0.87V. G. Kogan & R. Prozorov · 2011 · arXiv:1112.0996
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Scaling Dimensions and Stable Charged Fixed Point of Type-II Superconductors
similarity 0.87J. Hove & A. Sudbø
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Helicity modulus and fluctuating type-II superconductors: Elastic approximation and numerical simulations
similarity 0.87Tao Chen & S. Teitel
Source status unknown — claims are unverified